Core
Technology
Overview
|
The cure is worse than the disease.
The old adage "the cure is worse than the disease" regrettably is true with respect to the body's own response to injury. In an attempt to stop the spread of tissue damage from a localized, primary site of insult following a catastrophic event, the body needlessly targets a large area of tissue surrounding the injury for destruction. This leads to greater impairment and to a slow, limited recovery.
This overprotective, natural defense mechanism evolved long ago to protect the individual from succumbing to secondary damage from the primary event. The secondary damage of cells and tissues is in fact the reason for slow and incomplete recovery from illnesses and injuries like stroke, heart attack or spinal cord trauma.
Therefore, this secondary damage of cells and tissues serves no survival function and is in fact the reason for slow and incomplete recovery from such illnesses and injuries.
Warren Pharmaceuticals has identified novel proteins named tissue protective cytokines (TPCs) with potent protective effects that diminish and reverse the underlying cellular damage in these significant diseases.
The zone of reversible damage previously off limits to interventional therapy is now accessible, even across the normally impenetrable blood-brain and blood-retina barriers. Tissue Protective Cytokines have the property of traversing normally restrictive barriers in various parts of the body that exclude access by drugs. TPCs for delivery to the brain or eye, for example, can be easily administered by intravenous injection.
First Generation Tissue Protective Cytokines.
Erythropoietin (EPO), the hormone stimulating the production and differentiation of red blood cells, and it is widely used for treating anemia of renal disease or anemia induced by chemotherapy.
In animal models, Warren scientists have generated evidence that EPO also protects tissues throughout the body against excessive cell death as a consequence of severe diseases and injuries. These findings have been confirmed by a number of independent investigators. A clinical trial conducted in Germany showed beneficial neuroprotective effects of EPO in patients when administered within 8 hours of stroke, confirming tissue protection by EPO in man.
In order to avoid hematopoetic effects of EPO, Warren Pharmaceuticals sought to separate the blood cell stimulating and tissue protective activities of EPO.
Second generation EPO derivatives.
By extensively studying the structure-activity relationship of EPO and its derivatives, Warren scientists were first to elucidate the two biologically distinct functions of EPO through its interaction with two very different types of receptors. This discovery led Warren to engineer a variety of second generation EPO molecules that possess potent tissue protective properties without stimulating red blood cell production, making therapy potentially useful in a large number of disease areas. Warren subsequently has pioneered the preclinical development of cytokine technology in tissue regeneration and protection for the treatment of devastating injuries and diseases including acute kidney failure, heart attack, stroke, spinal cord injury, and acute macular edema.

Understanding the Body's Response to Injury
From the perspective of evolutionary selection, this tissue response to injury evolved as an effective mechanism for reducing the risk of infection and of protecting the surrounding healthy tissue from additional injury. Several pathways are involved in this tissue response to injury.
Cutting losses.
First, the blood flow to the damaged area is constrained in order to minimize blood loss, maintain blood pressure and reduce oxygen and nutrient flow to the effected tissue.
Within hours, certain tissue factors, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), are released by the damaged cells into their surroundings. These factors attract macrophages, white blood cells specialized in cleaning up damaged tissues. Furthermore, the nutrient flow between affected and healthy tissue is interrupted in order to isolate the injured area.
As a result, cells within the affected region begin to die, predominantly via programmed cell death, or apoptosis. Moderate inflammatory reactions ensue, helping to clean up the damaged tissue. As the inflammation abates, repair mechanisms become activated and ultimately lead to the formation of a scar.
Tissue-specific effects.
Although the temporal occurrence of these pathways is principally observed independently of tissue and injury type, tissues have developed highly specialized and specific responses to certain injuries.
For example, subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain often leading to stroke) is associated with an immediate and pronounced vasoconstriction of cerebral vessels, as an attempt by the body to diminish the extent of bleeding.
On the other hand, a thromboembolic coronary event (leading to a heart attack) induces little vasospasm but rather results in an extensive inflammatory response within the ischemic area, accelerating the removal of necrotic tissue and scar formation. Rapid formation of a strong scar is imperative in the mechanically stressed cardiac tissue to avoid the potential complications of cardiac rupture and aneurysm formation.
Murder by death.
Apoptosis, programmed cell death and more dramatically known as cell suicide, is a critical component of the human tissue injury response.
In apoptosis, a genetic program leads to degradation of nuclear DNA, followed by shrinking and fragmentation of the nucleus. In contrast to cellular necrosis, which is an irreversible cell death typically found at the epicenter of a tissue injury, apoptosis occurs in potentially viable cells, typically located at the periphery of the injured area.
Surviving neighboring cells and macrophages quickly absorb the shriveled corpses of apoptotic cells, limiting the extent and degree of the secondary inflammatory response associated with cell damage and death.
Within hours of the injury, additional inflammatory cells migrate to the injured area and further promote the removal of dead cells. Eventually, new cells are formed from the surrounding healthy tissue or from progenitor (stem) cells, and a scar is formed.
|
Bigger is not better.
The demarcation of the damaged area from healthy surrounding tissue through apoptosis, as described above, may be life saving in the absence of modern therapeutics and overall medical care. However, it has been shown in numerous animal injury and disease models involving apoptosis that the pharmacological reduction of apoptosis results in improved functional and histomorphometric outcomes.
Therefore, it is quite likely that in today's health care environment the salvage of potentially viable cells by anti-apoptotic therapeutics may be a highly cost-effective approach to the treatment of injuries and illnesses associated with a high level of apoptosis.
The potential benefit would be particularly important in vital tissues regenerating at a very slow rate, such as cardiac myocytes, retinal photoreceptors and neuronal cells. Recent scientific work demonstrates the presence of apoptosis in a wide range of acute and chronic human illnesses.
Myocardial infarction (heart attack), chronic heart failure, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Lou Gehrig's disease are all disorders in which apoptosis appears to be an important pathogenic factor. For example it has been shown that in chronic heart failure, cardiac cells undergo apoptosis at a rate about 200 times greater than in normal heart tissue.
Reducing these secondary consequences of damage to tissues surrounding the primary sites of disease or injury would reduce the overall degree of impairment and increase the potential for recovery.
These indications represent significant patient populations and disease areas with limited therapeutic options.
| Organ/System |
Disease |
US Prevalence |
BRAIN /
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM |
Stroke
Alzheimer's Disease
Multiple Sclerosis
Spinal Cord Injury (incidence) |
600,000
4,000,000
300,000
11,000
|
| EYE |
Diabetic Retinopathy/Acute Macular Edema
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
|
1,000,000
1,700,000
|
| HEART |
Chronic Heart Failure
Myocardial Infarction (prevalence) |
4,800,000
1,100,000
|
| PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM |
Diabetic Neuropathy |
1,000,000
|
| KIDNEY |
Transplant (per year)
Acute Renal Failure
Diabetic Nephropathy |
11,000
160,000
2,000,000 |
|
|
General Properties of
Tissue
Protective
Cytokines
(TPCs)
|
TPCs have been shown, in animal models, to prevent cell-death (anti-apoptotic), reduce inflammation (anti-inflammatory), and improve autoregulation of blood vessels in a number of tissues, in particular the retina, kidney, heart, brain and the spinal cord.
In addition, TPCs have been shown to have potent stem cell recruitment activity which has been highly correlated with enhanced tissue repair.
|
General Features of
Tissue Protective Cytokines
Restore vascular autoregulation
Inhibit excitatory transmitter release
Maintain synaptic transmission
Inhibit apoptosis
Reduce inflammatory response
Enhance tissue repair
Reduce edema
Recruit stem cells
Increase resistance to oxidative
injury (pre-conditioning and post-conditioning)
|
|

Click to view larger chart |
The extent and severity of tissue damage
and scar formation secondary to a site
of disease or injury are markedly reduced
in the presence of TPCs.
|
TPCs Prevent Apoptosis.
In numerous in vitro and disease model studies, Warren Pharmaceuticals' TPCs have been shown to protect damaged cells from undergoing apoptosis, or programmed cell death.
Also, the apoptotic death of cells undergoing serum starvation is prevented by TPC.
Furthermore, Warren Pharmaceuticals' TPCs prevents apoptosis of cardiomyocytes, the muscle cells of the heart.
TPCs Reduce inflammation.
By reducing production of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IL-1 in sites of injury, TPCs prevent at an early stage the inflammatory response, reducing influx of inflammatory cells, etc., that can exponentially increase the severity of the disease and recovery time.
TPCs Restore Blood Flow.
Another important mechanism of action is through restoring and maintaining nourishment to the cells at risk as a result of disease or injury. One of the impairments is a disruption in cell-to-cell communication via their intercellular junctions. In order to save viable cells, not only must apoptosis be inhibited, but the uncoupling of gap junctions around uninjured cells must also be reversed.
Through gap junction regulation, TPCs influence metabolic exchange between myocyte cells in the heart, between neuron cells and astrocytes in the brain, and between retinal cells and Muller cells in the eye.
As a result TPC's are able to ensure sustenance for viable cells that would otherwise be isolated and starved. This mechanism of action compliments the anti-apoptotic properties of the TPCs by maintaining the viability of the targeted tissue.
TPCs Reduce Edema
Leakiness of blood vessels allowing escape of fluids into underlying tissues is a hallmark of the inflammatory response which occurs in acute injury as well as chronic disease.
Swelling of the brain resulting from blunt trauma or shear injury, as well as retinal damage in diabetes from macular edema, lead to devastating and often permanent functional impairments. TPCs have been shown to prevent vascular leakiness in the brain and eye in models of these conditions.
TPCs Recruit Stem Cells to the Site of Injury.
Part of the body's recovery mechanism after injury is repopulating the site of injury to replace dead cells. TPCs actively recruit stem cells to the site of injury which, in the milieu of maintained cell survival, lack of inflammatory stimuli, and better tissue perfusion and blood flow, encourage multiplication and growth of new cells to complete the repair process.
Active Transport Across Tissue Barriers.
Despite their large molecular size, TPCs are actively and effectively transported across blood-tissue barriers, including blood-brain and blood-retina barriers. This allows for the treatment of neurological and retinal diseases by systemic administration (e.g., intravenous) and eliminates the discomfort and complications of regionalized dosing (e.g., injection into the eye).
Anticipated Favorable Safety Profile.
Pre-clinical studies have shown TPCs to be well tolerated. No treatment related side-effects have so far been observed. In particular, no side-effects typical of EPO treatment (hypertension, thromboembolic events) have occurred.
.
|
Discovery Research.
In an ongoing program to identify TPCs with more potent activities, Warren Pharmaceuticals has developed several TPCs in various classes, and is pursuing the following compounds:
Warren
Pharmaceuticals'
Tissue Protective
Cytokine |
In vitro
Tissue
Protection
Demonstrated |
Tissue Protection Demonstrated
in Disease/Injury Model |
Potential Clinical Indications to be Pursued |
| TPC-1 |
Yes |
Myocardial Infarction
Chronic Heart Failure
Stroke
Spinal Cord Injury
Retinal Injury
Peripheral Neuropathy
Kidney Failure |
Central Nervous System |
| TPC-2 |
Yes |
Myocardial Infarction
Chronic Heart Failure
Stroke
Retinal Injury
Peripheral Neuropathy
Kidney Failure |
Heart
Eye
Kidney
|
TPC-3
TPC-4
TPC-5
TPC-6
TPC-7
TPC-8
|
Yes |
Peripheral neuropathy |
To be determined |
|
|
|
|
Proof of
Principle in
Disease
Models
|
Preclinical studies conducted to date in numerous disease models have shown dramatic improvements in tissue viability and reduction of severity of disease or disability after administration of TPCs. Along with a positive overall impact on the disease model, when examined at the various cellular and tissue levels described above, there is a corresponding positive effect on cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis, reducing inflammation and increasing perfusion of tissues in the at-risk zone surrounding the primary site of disease or injury. This extensive compendium of in vitro and in vivo data strongly supports the future clinical potential of Warren Pharmaceutical's TPCs to positively impact the treatment of many diseases.
The table below represents only a subset of positive efficacy studies in disease models. Click on a study to obtain expanded information on design and outcome.
|
|
|
Publications
|
| Mechanism of Action: Warren TPCs |
“Erythropoietin mediates tissue protection through an erythropoietin and common ß-subunit heteroreceptor”
Brines et al., Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
October 12, 2004
|
Download
PDF |
| Efficacy: Warren TPCs |
| Cardiovascular |
|
“Erythropoietin, Modified to Not Stimulate Red Blood Cell Production, Retains Its Cardioprotective Properties”
Moon et al. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutic
March 2006
|
Download PDF |
|
”Cytoprotective doses of erythropoietin or carbamylated erythropoietin have markedly different procoagulant and vasoactive activities.”
Coleman et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
April 11, 2006
|
Download PDF |
"A nonerythropoietic derivative of erythropoietin protects the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury"
Fiordaliso et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
February 8, 2005
|
Download
PDF |
| Nervous System |
“Nonhematopoietic Erythropoietin Derivatives Prevent Motoneuron Degeneration In Vitro and In Vivo”
Menini et al., Molecular Medicine In Press
|
Download PDF |
“Carbamylated Erythropoietin Reduces Radiosurgically Induced Brain Injury.”
Erbayraktar et al., Molecular Medicine
June 20, 2006
|
Download PDF |
”Delayed administration of erythropoietin and its non-erythropoietic derivatives ameliorates chronic murine autoimmune encephalomyelitis.”
Savino et al., Journal of Neuroimmunology
March 2006
|
Download PDF |
“Reduced functional deficits, neuroinflammation, and secondary tissue damage after treatment of stroke by nonerythropoietic erythropoietin derivatives."
Villa et al., Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
July 12, 2006
|
Download PDF |
“Protective effect of erythropoietin and its carbamylated derivative in experimental Cisplatin peripheral neurotoxicity.”
Bianchi et al. Clinical Cancer Research
April 15, 2006
|
Download PDF |
“Amelioration of spinal cord compressive injury by pharmacological preconditioning with erythropoietin and a nonerythropoietic erythropoietin derivative”.
Grasso et al., Journal of the Neurosurgery of the Spine
April 4, 2006
|
Download PDF |
"Asialoerythropoietin is a nonerythropoietic cytokine with broad neuroprotective activity in vivo".
Erbayraktar et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
May 27, 2003. |
Download
PDF |
| Review Articles & Proof of Principle: EPO |
“Methylprednisolone neutralizes the beneficial effects of erythropoietin in experimental spinal cord injury.”
Gorio et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
November 8, 2005 |
Download
PDF |
“Discovering erythropoietin's extra-hematopoietic functions: biology and clinical promise.”
Brines and Cerami, Kidney International
July 2006
|
Download
PDF |
“Emerging biological roles for erythropoietin in the nervous system.”
Brines & Cerami, Nature Reviews of Neurosciences
June 2005 |
Download
PDF |
"Erythropoietin as an antiapoptotic, tissue-protective cytokine"
P. Ghezzi and M. Brines, Cell Death and Differentiation
February 4, 2004 |
Download
PDF |
"Erythropoietin both protects from and reverses experimental diabetic neuropathy".
Bianchi et al., Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
January 20, 2004. |
Download
PDF |
"Recombinant human erythropoietin protects the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury and promotes beneficial remodeling"
Calvillo et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
April 15, 2003
|
Download
PDF |
"Erythropoietin administration protects retinal neurons from acute ischemia-reperfusion injury".
Junk et al., Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
August 6, 2002. |
Download
PDF |
"Recombinant human erythropoietin counteracts secondary injury and markedly enhances neurological recovery from experimental spinal cord trauma".
Gorio et al., Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
July 9, 2002. |
Download
PDF |
"Erythropoietin therapy for acute stroke is both safe and beneficial".
Ehrenreich et al., Molecular Medicine
June 28, 2002.
|
Download
PDF |
"Erythropoietin prevents neuronal apoptosis after cerebral ischemia and metabolic stress".
Siren et al., Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
March 27, 2001. |
Download
PDF |
"Erythropoietin crosses the blood-brain barrier to protect against experimental brain injury".
Brines et al., Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
September 12, 2000. |
Download
PDF |
|
|
|